Skip to main content

100ms vs Zoom

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Video Conferencing providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

100ms vs Zoom at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

100msZoom
Overall score69/10092/100
TierStandardElite
Capability (editorial)6890
Ease of use (editorial)6891
Value (editorial)7093
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Zoom is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (92/100 vs 69/100), but both are credible Video Conferencing options. 100ms fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; Zoom fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

100ms

100ms is live video infrastructure.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read 100ms review

Zoom

Zoom powers meetings, webinars, and async video.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Zoom review

100ms vs Zoom — FAQ

Is 100ms better than Zoom?

On RankedVendors, Zoom scores 92/100 versus 100ms's 69/100, so Zoom ranks higher overall in Video Conferencing. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between 100ms and Zoom?

100ms is live video infrastructure. Zoom powers meetings, webinars, and async video. Both compete in Video Conferencing; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, 100ms or Zoom?

Our editorial value scores put 100ms at 70/100 and Zoom at 93/100. 100ms is Quote-based; Zoom is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.