Skip to main content

Wrike vs Teamwork

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Project Management providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

Wrike vs Teamwork at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

WrikeTeamwork
Overall score77/10087/100
TierStandardPremium
Capability (editorial)7787
Ease of use (editorial)7785
Value (editorial)7886
Best forMid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Teamwork is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (87/100 vs 77/100), but both are credible Project Management options. Wrike fits mid-market, enterprise; Teamwork fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

Wrike

Wrike is work management for teams and enterprises.

Best for: Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Wrike review

Teamwork

Teamwork plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Teamwork review

Wrike vs Teamwork — FAQ

Is Wrike better than Teamwork?

On RankedVendors, Teamwork scores 87/100 versus Wrike's 77/100, so Teamwork ranks higher overall in Project Management. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between Wrike and Teamwork?

Wrike is work management for teams and enterprises. Teamwork plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Both compete in Project Management; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, Wrike or Teamwork?

Our editorial value scores put Wrike at 78/100 and Teamwork at 86/100. Wrike is Quote-based; Teamwork is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.