Skip to main content

Wrike vs Asana

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Project Management providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

Wrike vs Asana at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

WrikeAsana
Overall score90/10092/100
TierEliteElite
Capability (editorial)8992
Ease of use (editorial)8893
Value (editorial)8689
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Asana is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (92/100 vs 90/100), but both are credible Project Management options. Wrike fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; Asana fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

Wrike

Wrike plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Wrike review

Asana

Asana plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Asana review

Wrike vs Asana — FAQ

Is Wrike better than Asana?

On RankedVendors, Asana scores 92/100 versus Wrike's 90/100, so Asana ranks higher overall in Project Management. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between Wrike and Asana?

Wrike plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Asana plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Both compete in Project Management; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, Wrike or Asana?

Our editorial value scores put Wrike at 86/100 and Asana at 89/100. Wrike is Quote-based; Asana is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.